1. But really, for the genealogy and family history, most of us knowthat for every rule there is certainly an exemption. Good vexing section ofgenealogy is the fact no-one really knows how to use the new conditions orrules with any definitive adjective including always, perhaps, probably,most likely, etcetera. It could be fascinating if here other advice ofjointures getting generated a-year or a couple immediately following a known relationship date.
dos. Is there an extant dispensation for the marriage out of ElizabethClifford and you can Sir Ralph Bowes have been 3rd cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or 4th cousins, after taken off the brand new 5th LordClifford? Who would narrow down their marriage date.
Arthur
Allegedly, if good dispensation are looked for and you can granted, it would havebeen from the one of several adopting the, and could appear in the new correspondingregister guide, whether it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop off Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop away from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop from Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop from Carlisle 1509-1520
5. In the event the tenth Lord Clifford does wed at the beginning of 1487 [say January] andhas E later for the reason that season, does the fresh new chronology perhaps not functions?
John hands?
Elizabeth born from inside the later 1487, Henry created from inside the 1488/nine, Joan inside the ,etc. filling in the brand new brands of upload off . In the event the (a) thechronology nonetheless work; and you may (b) her wedding portion wasn’t reasonable; thenwe only have the 1505 pedigree away from Henry VII’s which is during the oppositionto this new supposition one to she was a legitimate child.
six. About your 1505 pedigree: Would be the Clifford daughters brand new onlyknown Henry VII relations omitted? Have there been others? In this case,would not one reflect poorly with this file due to the fact a source?
Regarding contrasting We have produced from the brand new c.1505 Henry VII Relationships pedigreeswith new 1480-1500 Visitation of the North pedigrees, which are
Throughout the c.1505 Web veza web stranice Connections pedigrees, the brand new Clifford youngsters are perhaps not listedin an excellent Clifford pedigree, but instead on St. John pedigree. Because the I’mnot used to the fresh St. John loved ones, following the ‚s the recommendations asit appears from the c.1505 pedigree, since the obtained from the brand new 1834 Coll. Better. etGen. post. The new phrasing in quotations is strictly as it seems inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).
„Zero. XII.“From my personal Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Pole, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.“f.288, 296, 317, 318.“Margaret Duchess away from Somerset got three husbands.“ By the „John Duke ofSomerset“ she got „My Lady the brand new King’s Mother.“ who’d „The fresh new King.“ whohad „Prince „From the „Sir Oliver Saint John, basic partner.“ she got step three daus & dos sons:
An excellent. „Edith, married in order to Geoffrey Pole of Buckinghamshire.“ That they had:A1. „Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married toward Lady Margaret, dau. out-of theDuke of Clarence.“ That they had: „Harry. „A2. „Alianor, wedded to help you Ralph Verney, Esq.“ They’d: „John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[a unique youngster, unnamed].“
B. „John Ssint John, esq.“ He had four youngsters:B1. „Sir John Saint John, Knight.“ who had „Four daughters and you may oneson.“B2. „Anne, wedd. so you’re able to Harry Lord Clifford.“ They had „Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and you will heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.“B3. „Elizabeth, married to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. from Lincolnshire.“B4. „An excellent Nun away from Shaftesbury.“B5. „Oliver Saint John.“
C. „Dame Mary, married in order to Sir Richard Frognall.“ That they had:C1. „Edmond Frognall and his brethren and you can sistren.“ With issueindicated, however called.C2. „E, married so you can Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.“
D. „Age, wedded very first to the Lord Zouche; just after for the LordScrope away from Bolton.“ Issue:D1. [by the Zouche] “ Catesby.“ They’d:“Elizabeth. George. John. William.“D2. [by Scrope] “ Conyers.“ Having issueindicated but not entitled.
Margaret Duchess of Somerset, because of the „Lionel Lord Welles, past spouse.“had: „John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. of K. Edward IV.“ andthey had „Elizabeth.“
